[Q] I’m intrigued by a recent quote from your blog: “a map is the fastest way I know of bringing me up to speed of a complex and complicated environment. It’s also the fastest way of discovering just how little I know.” Can you tell us a bit more about how maps can help leaders identify and fill in their knowledge gaps?
[A] Mapping is a method of getting people to describe their assumptions around a space in a visual way that others can then add to and challenge. It forces people to think about who the users are (whether customer, regulators, staff or the business), what their needs are, what components are required and how we should treat those components. Despite this all sounding like bread and butter for a business, it’s surprisingly common for companies not to understand these basics.
[Q] As you prepare for your trip Down Under, I’m interested as to whether you think Australian companies have to deal with any unique sources of uncertainty or disruption.
[A] It’s not just companies that are in competition, but nation states too. I’ve done quite a bit of work on China vs US, for example, and the level of gameplay that exists between nations. Hence, it’s unavoidable that there will be specific issues in certain nations. However, though I’ve taught people within the Australian Government how to map, I’ve not been personally involved … So yes, there will be unique sources of uncertainty and disruption but no, I’m not knowledgeable enough to say what they are.
[Q] Broadly speaking, where do you think organisations need to improve when creating and implementing strategy?
[A] Strategy in the majority of organisations is little more than meme copying, gut feel and magic frameworks. It’s quite rare to find an organisation which has a systematic mechanism of learning, communication and challenge. So, to the question of where I think organisations need to improve with strategy, my answer is simply that it would be useful if they actually had one, rather than just a meaningless jumble of words.
The real question, however, should be whether it even matters! Alas, it is perfectly fine to be hopeless at strategy, so long as all your competitors are.
[Q] Much of your work focuses on how mapping improves situational awareness within organisations. Why is it so important for companies to have a solid situational awareness, and which organisations would you point to as exemplars in this field?
[A] Situational awareness is rarely uniform across an organisation. There are several, mostly home-grown, methods for understanding a competitive landscape. It’s for this reason that you find pockets of mapping across Silicon Valley and governments, rather than seeing entire organisations using mapping.
Why does it matter? Well, it matters in the same way that situational awareness matters in other competitive landscapes, such as the military. Mapping tends to help to look at the landscape before making a choice.
For something more concrete: in one study we undertook, it turned out that companies with higher levels of situational awareness tend to have a more positive market cap growth over a seven year period. That. of course. is just one study and, on its own, it should be treated with skepticism. There are fortunately new studies on mapping being undertaken jointly by Cambridge University and the London School of Economics. We will just have to wait and find out what the academics say before we can make any definitive statement!
[Q] You’ve previously identified bias as being one of organisations’ biggest obstacles to progress. I’m curious as to whether you think companies are being increasingly forced to confront this bias and find ways of overcoming it — as we see them making public commitments to improve board diversity. Or will bias always be an issue plaguing organisational leadership?
[A] There are multiple issues at play here – inertia, bias and diversity. Inertia comes from pre-existing capital (whether activities, practices or data) to a way of doing something. If that environment evolves, then this capital can become a hurdle to change (e.g. the Sunk Cost Fallacy. There are about sixteen different forms of inertia that I’m aware of and there are tactics to deal with each.
Bias has all sorts of roots in culture, heritage and other origins. There are many forms of bias and they interfere with our decision process. Take, for example, outcome bias, and our deep belief that just because something once worked, it will work again, without understanding the reasons why. There’s also authority bias: our belief that someone more senior is always right. Fortunately, educational tactics to combat bias can be learned such as critical thinking.
Diversity – or, more likely, the lack of diversity – is a major problem, as it means we have limited our ability to access a broad range of ideas. From biological systems to organisations, a lack of diversity in options and thought is never a good idea. It can seriously hamper an ecosystem’s ability to evolve or even survive a change.
[Q] Social media has magnified the impact of PR blunders — nowadays, a company’s entire reputation can change overnight. As the consumer’s voice becomes increasingly amplified online, how can companies ensure they’re truly connecting with and anticipating customers’ needs?
[A] There are many techniques to help increase our awareness of user needs, from basic interviews to understanding the customer journey. However, the first part is to realise that there are users and that those users have needs. In most cases I encounter, entire classes of users have never been considered before. Resolving this has normally been a case of people mapping out the space and someone going “what about these people?”… and then the penny often drops.
[Q] Finally, I have to ask: what’s the craziest thing you’ve ever mapped?!
[A] I have a friend who created a science fiction book – The Punch Escrow – using mapping. The book has met with notable success and is currently being turned into a film. I have seen people mapping themselves, others using maps to save lives (reducing call out times for emergency services), and even monks that map.
Personally, the most inspiring work I’ve been involved with has been mapping within the United Nations; from mission statements of reducing global poverty to the nuts and bolts of the statistical information that is needed to support this.
We’re still buzzing from Australia’s national celebration of deeptech innovation that was held in Sydney last week on Wednesday 23 October!
Companies from across the nation shared how they are tackling big challenges with quantum computing, next generation robots, clever climate change solutions, inspiring healthtech and so much more.
After eleven years of Tech23, people often ask what have we learnt over the years. The answer is lots! For example…
Over ten years ago – when the GFC was looming and the Federal Government’s support for innovation was ‘under review’ –Tech23 was born. At the time, Cicada was the main game in town, Sydney Angels was just forming, and the University of Sydney’s Incubate and the University of Melbourne’s MAP were still a few years away from being established.